Possibility of third party entry in international investment dispute for protection of human rights
Subject Areas : Ethics and Islamic Education
Mohsen
Abdollahi
1
Nafiseh
Shakeri
2
Keywords: international investment, human rights, international investment arbitration, Third-party entry in international investment dispute,
Abstract :
International investment law and substantive and procedural rules for dispute settlement through arbitration mechanism is under experience and evaluation. Theoretical reasoning and procedure play an important role in this process. One of the issues raised in this field of law is the possibility of considering international human rights as part of the governing law, and consequently considering human rights obligations for both contracting parties of the investment agreement. Given that human rights commitments often do not meet the economic interests of both parties, they are likely to be ignored and neglected. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss how to monitor the human rights act of international investment parties. One solution to meet this need is to pay attention to the oversight exercised those who are outside the investment contract or the third party to the contract. In this study, considering the theoretical and procedural justifications, the present conditions of the possibility of a third party entry into an investment dispute is examined from a human rights standpoint
تقی زاده انصاری، مصطفی، ترمینولوژی حقوق بین الملل، انتشارات خرسندی، 1394،
جعفری ندوشن، شهاب، حقوق حل اختلافات سرمایه گذاری های خارجی، 1397، نشر میزان، تهران
دالرز، رودلف و شروئر، کریستف، اصول حقوق بین الملل سرمایه گذاری، انتشارات شهردانش، 1391.
سید نورانی، سید محمدرضا و محمدپور، حسن، 1395، تاثیر سرمایه گذاری مستقیم خارجی در اشتغال در کشورهای عضو OECD و کشورهای در حال توسعه،در اقتصاد و تجارت نوین، سال یازدهم شماره سوم،
شریفی طرازکوهی، حسین و سیه جانی، نازیلا،1394، نقش و جایگاه موافقت نامه های منطقه ای نفتا و آ سه آن در پیشبرد و تضمین ابعاد و انواع حقوق بشر، نشریه مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 6 شماره 1
قاسمی حامد، عباس، حقوق اقتصادی، انتشارات دراک، چاپ دوم، 1396،
یزدانی، غلامرضا، ایکسید و نقض قرارداد سرمایه گذاری، 1396، مشهد، انتشارات آستان قدس،
Bernhard von Pezold and Others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/15,Procedural Order No 2, 26 June 2012; Border Timbers Limited, Border Timbers International (Private) Limited, and Hangani Development Co. (Private) Limited v. Republic of Zimbabwe, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/25 – Procedural Order No 2, 26 June 2012.
Canada Model BIT Art.39, 2004, USA BIT Art.28 paraa3,2012.
Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v. The Republic of Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2009-23, Submission of Amici, 5 November2010.
http://italaw.com/documents/Chevron_v_Ecuador_SubmissionOfAmici_5Nov2010.pdf.
CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/08, Award (12 May 2005)
Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd., et al. v. United State of America, UNCITRAL, Amicus Curiae Submission of the Office of the National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations,19 January,2009, http://www.italaw.com/cases/510#sthash.0n3vmJKm.dpuf.
ICSID Arbitration Rules of Procedure, Rules 37(2).
Methanex Corporation v. US, UNCITRAL, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions from Third Persons to intervene as“Amici Curiae”,15 January2001
Norms and the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights, U.N.Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2.(2003)
Petition for Participation as Non-disputing Party Pursuant to Article 41 (3) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules, Presented by the International Commission of Jurists , available at www.icj.org/IMG/ICJ-Petition-Foresti-V-RSA-19-Aug2009.Pdf
Sempra Energy v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16, Award (28 September 2007) ;Sempra Energy v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16, Decision on Annulment (29 June 2010)
Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A. and Vivendi Universal, S.A. v. Argentina ,ICSID ARB/03/19,October in Response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae of May19,2005
United Parcel Services of America, Inc. v. Canada, UNCIRAL, Award on the Merits, 24 May2007, para.3.
United Nations Secretary General, Objectives and themes of UN Conference on Sustainable Development, P. 3, UN. Doc. A/CONF. 216/ PC 17(Dec, 2010)
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=92038966-e18c-4a97-9593-29d20091e474