Civil liability and moral responsibility of governments in proportion to the exercise of their executive role
Subject Areas : Ethics and Islamic Education
SEYEDAMIR
ALEMOHAMMAD
1
(edalat)
ali akbar
gorji
2
(edalat)
Keywords: responsibility, government responsibility, role of government, civil responsibility, moral responsibility. ,
Abstract :
The role of the state in political society is the most important discussion of political philosophy about the state. However, whether we consider the origin of the state as a contract or the state as a natural phenomenon, the mission we ascribe to it can be raised to some extent independently of the discussion of its origin. Theories related to the role of government can be divided into two main groups. The first group, which considers the limited intervention of the government in society, includes the school of liberalism and its different tendencies and perceptions. In this group, the role of the government is basically negative and deterrent, and government intervention in citizens' rights has an exceptional aspect that must be justified based on the basic concepts of freedom, justice and equality. It is the government. In these theories, the starting point of the discussion is society and the individual is considered a subject of society. However, in this group, too, there is a lot of respect for freedom. However, the provision of freedom is not possible except in the shadow of justice (especially distributive justice) and equality. The most prominent representative of this group is the school of socialism, which is very common in the political systems of Europe today. These roles of governments from a moral point of view have significantly affected the fate of individuals and economic actors and have sometimes caused great damage to them. Accordingly, it is necessary to examine the nature of the policies of these two groups in terms of being in the category of governance or enterprise, from a moral perspective, to examine the possibility of compensation and the basis of this compensation.
افلاطون، جمهور، ترجمه فواد روحاني، انتشارات علمي و فرهنگي، چاپ دهم
بشيريه، حسين، عقل در سياست ، نشر نگاه معاصر، 1382
ساليوان، راجر، اخلاق در فلسفه كانت، ترجمه عزت الله فولادوند، طرح نو، چاپ اول، 1380
هابز، توماس، لوياتان، ترجمه حسين بشيريه، نشر ني، چاپ چهارم، 1385
همپتن ، جين، فلسفه سياسي، ترجمه خشايار ديهيمي ، طرح نو، چاپ دوم
.ر.ک: بهاءالدین پازارگاد. تاریخ فلسفه سیاسی، ج 1 (تهران: زوار، 1334) فصل 10.
. هومن یزدانی 1390فصلنامه حقوق،مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی،دوره 41،شماره 3،پاییز1390
منوچهر آشتیانی،جامعه شناسی دینی،سوره اندیشه،شماره 48و 49،بهمن 1389
واعظى, احمد. (1383). نارسایى قرائت اخلاقى «رالز» از لیبرالیسم. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی علوم سیاسی, (شماره بیست و ششم - تابستان 83), 53-74.
خداویسی حسن، عزتی شورگلی احمد. اخلاق در نظام های اقتصادی سرمایه داری، سوسیالیستی و اسلام. نشریه اقتصاد و بانکداری اسلامي. ۱۳۹۴; ۴ (۱۲) :۹۳-۱۲۰
Black burn, Robin, Ideology in social sciences , Fourth impression 1976, fonta collins
Tillich, Paul, political expectation, Mercer university Rose press, 1ed , 1981
Hayek, Friedrich A, La route de La servitude, traduit par Blumberg, Press universitaire de France, 2 ed, 1985
Hegel, philosophie of right, translated by knox, oxford, 1949
Held, David, political theories and modern state, polity press , 1989
Rousseau, Jean Jacque, Du contract social, edition de Magnard Paris, 1994
Rawls, John, collected Papers, Edited by samvel, Freeman, Harvard university prss, 1999, P.01
are Richard, Rawl's theory of Justice, Published in Reading Rawls Edited by Norman Daniels, stanford university Press. 1989,
beneton, philippe(1998), toplumsal siniflar, çev: hüsün dilli, istanbul: iletisiyayinlari, 1995.
lukes, steven,(1998), marksizm ve ahlak(çeviren: osman akinhay), birinci
baski, istanbul, ayrinti yayinlar, 1998.
edel, abraham, flowers, elizabeth, o, connor, finbarr w. (1998), morality, osophy and practice historical and contemporary reading and studies, new york, random house, 1998.
çagrici, mustafa(1991), islam ahlaki, 2 baski, istanbul, temel kültür dizisi no:6, ensar nesryat, 1991.