The social structure of administrative bureaucracy with its influence on the introduction of technolog
Subject Areas : Ethics and Islamic Educationamin amiri 1 , aliakbar aminbidokhti 2 * , mahdi Sanei 3
1 -
2 -
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Shahrood Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrood, Iran
Keywords: Technology Import, Administrative Bureaucracy, Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance.,
Abstract :
The process of social evolution and progress and the speed of this evolution depend on many variables, one of which is technology. Some believe that technological advances are changing many aspects of daily life. At present, in many developing countries, including our country, Iran, organizations are showing a great desire to use and use these information technologies. Given that in the future, no factor such as information technology will be able to change the design of organizations. Research in this field will be necessary, so the purpose of this research is to investigate the impact of technology introduction on administrative bureaucracies. The statistical population in a small stage includes all employees of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, whose number is 800 people. The sampling method in this study is available. There are 260 people using the Cochran's formula. Also, to evaluate the variables and measure them in the field, a researcher-made questionnaire has been used. 48.866 and path coefficient of 0.91 have a significant effect and the introduction of technology has a significant effect on research strategies in the staff of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance with test statistics of 2.933 and path coefficient of 0.408 and research intervention factors on research strategies in employees of Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance with test statistics of 3.596 The path coefficient has a significant effect of 0.470 and the research factors have a significant effect on research strategies in the staff of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance with Azman statistics of 4.253 and the path coefficient of 0.556. Finally, the introduction of technology on administrative bureaucracy And the path coefficient of 0.843 has a significant effect.
احمدی، مجتبی و جلالیان، امیررضا و خورشیدوند، ایمان،(1398)،تکنولوژی چه تاثیری بر زندگی انسان ها گذاشته است،چهارمین کنفرانس ملی ایده های نوین در فنی و مهندسی،رشت
اسفندیارپور، اقدس،(1395)،نقش تکنولوژی اطلاعات و ارتباطات در اداره تنوع فرهنگی نیروی کار مدرن و تیم های مجازی،اولین کنفرانس ملی حسابداری و مدیریت ،شیراز
اسماعیلی رادور، نجمه و سهیلی، جمال الدین،(1397)،بررسی تاثیر تکنولوژی های نو در ساخت ساختمان های مسکونی هوشمند ویژه
،بررسی نقش تکنولوژی و فناوری اطلاعات در مدیریت منابع انسانی،سومین همایش ملی سالیانه علوم مدیریت نوین،گرگان
آذر آئین، طاهره،(1399)،نقش منابع انسانی و تکنولوژی در پیشرفت سازمان های جهان سوم،اولین کنفرانس بین المللی مهندسی صنایع، مدیریت و حسابداری،تهران
توکل, محمد, سحابی, جلیل. (1392). بکارگیری روش ترکیبی جهت سنجش پیامدهای ورود تکنولوژی و صنعت به مناطق کردنشین جنوب آذربایجان غربی در ایران. پژوهش های جامعه شناسی معاصر (علمی – پژوهشی)1(2), 22-1.
سرگلزایی، علیرضا و صیادی، زهرا و سرگلزایی، صفورا،(1395)،بررسی و ارزیابی مدیریت دولتی نوین در ایران،سومین کنفرانس ملی علوم مدیریت نوین و برنامه ریزی پایدار ایران،تهران
صالحی، مریم،(1399)،بررسی تاثیر تکنولوژی و فناوری اطلاعات بر نیروی انسانی در سازمانها،نخستین کنفرانس ملی مدیریت، اخلاق و کسب و کار،شیراز
صرافی زاده، اصغر و کشاورزپور، محمد صفدر،(1396)،از بوروکراسی تا پسا بوروکراسی:بررسی روند تغییرات بوروکراسی،دومین کنفرانس بین المللی آینده پژوهی، مدیریت و توسعه اقتصادی،مشهد
طباییان، سید جواد،(1398)،بررسی تاثیر مدیریت تکنولوژی بر عملکرد سازمان از لحاظ نوآوری و کیفیت
قادری، علی و دروار، زینب و کمال آبادی، الهام،(1395)،نقش تکنولوژی در موفقیت آموزشی،اولین کنفرانس بین المللی نوآوری و تحقیق در علوم تربیتی، مدیریت و روانشناسی،تهران
قهرمانی، محمد.(1394). مقاله بررسی تأثیر مدیریت تکنولوژی و تحقیق و توسعه بر عملکرد سازمان از لحاظ نوآوری و کیفیت. دومین همایش ملی و دومین همایش بین المللی مدیریت و حسابداری ایران.
ملاحسینی، علی و مصطفوی، شهرزاد (1386)، ”ارزیابی چابکی سازمان با استفاده از منطق فازی“، ماهنامه تدبیر، سال هجدهم، 186.
ملاحسینی، علی و مصطفوی، شهرزاد (1386)، ”ارزیابی چابکی سازمان با استفاده از منطق فازی“، ماهنامه تدبیر، سال هجدهم، 186.
ملکی، مریم و قربان شیرودی، سوگل و میدانی، محمود،(1397)،تکنولوژی داروی اثربخش آموزش و یادگیری،سومین کنفرانس سراسری دانش و فناوری علوم تربیتی مطالعات اجتماعی و روانشناسی ایران،تهران
منصورزاده، سیدعلی و شفیعا، محمدعلی،(1397)،نقش موثر هوشمندی تکنولوژی بر قابلیتهای پویای سازمانی (مطالعه موردی : صنعت خودرو)،پنجمین همایش بین المللی صنعت خودرو ایران،تهران
مهرگان، فرهاد و صبحی، الهه،(1395)بوروکراسی، شالوده گذار به دموکراسی،اولین همایش بین المللی علوم مدیریت پیشرفت ها، نوآوری ها و چالش ها
واحدی، فاطمه و ذراتی، محمد،(1396)،نقد و بررسی فلسفی نظریه بوروکراسی وبر،اولین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت، اقتصاد، حسابداری و علوم تربیتی،ساری
Ahmed, A., Abu-Naser, S. S., El Talla, S. A., & Al Shobaki, M. J. (2018). The Impact of Information Technology Used on the Nature of Administrators Work at Al-Azhar University in Gaza.
Badawy, M.K., (2009a). “A Research Architecture for Technology Management Education”, A Three Volume Handbook of Technology Management: Key Concepts, Financial Tools and Techniques, Operations and Innovation Management, vol. 1. , Wiley, New York (this comprehensive volume will be available in a hard cover, and will also be posted on the web)
Badawy, M.K., (2009a). “A Research Architecture for Technology Management Education”, A Three Volume Handbook of Technology Management: Key Concepts, Financial Tools and Techniques, Operations and Innovation Management, vol. 1. , Wiley, New York (this comprehensive volume will be available in a hard cover, and will also be posted on the web).
Baekgaard, M., Mortensen, P. B., & Bech Seeberg, H. (2018). The bureaucracy and the policy agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 239-253.
Berry, D. (2020). Designing innovative clean energy programs: Transforming organizational strategies for a low-carbon transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 67, 101545.
Biesbroek, R., Peters, B. G., & Tosun, J. (2018). Public bureaucracy and climate change adaptation. Review of Policy Research, 35(6), 776-791.
Bolzani, D., Munari, F., Rasmussen, E., & Toschi, L. (2021). Technology transfer offices as providers of science and technology entrepreneurship education. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(2), 335-365.
Provan, D. J., Dekker, S. W., & Rae, A. J. (2017). Bureaucracy, influence and beliefs: A literature review of the factors shaping the role of a safety professional. Safety science, 98, 98-112.
Riccucci, N. M., Van Ryzin, G. G., & Jackson, K. (2018). Representative bureaucracy, race, and policing: A survey experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 506-518.
Romashkova, O. N., Ponomareva, L. A., Vasilyuk, I. P., & Gaidamaka, Y. V. (2018). Application of information technology for the analysis of the rating of university. In Workshop proceedings (Vol. 8, pp. 46-53).
Sastararuji, D., Hoonsopon, D., Pitchayadol, P., & Chiwamit, P. (2021, January). Cloud Accounting Adoption in Small and Medium Enterprises: An Integrated Conceptual Framework: Five factors of determinant were identified by integrated Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, Diffusion of Innovation (DOI), Institutional Theory (INT) and extended factors. In 2021 The 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management (pp. 32-38).
Spieker, S. (2017). The big archive: Art from bureaucracy. Mit Press.
Størkersen, K., Thorvaldsen, T., Kongsvik, T., & Dekker, S. (2020). How deregulation can become overregulation: an empirical study into the growth of internal bureaucracy when governments take a step back. Safety Science, 128, 104772.
Bull, M., Watson, D., Amin, S. N., & Carrington, K. (2021). Women and policing in the South Pacific: a pathway towards gender-inclusive organizational reform. Police practice and research, 22(1), 389-408.
Bullock, J. B. (2019). Artificial intelligence, discretion, and bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(7), 751-761.
Cayford, M., & Pieters, W. (2020). Effectiveness fettered by bureaucracy–why surveillance technology is not evaluated. Intelligence and National Security, 1-16.
Cornell, A., Knutsen, C. H., & Teorell, J. (2020). Bureaucracy and Growth. Comparative Political Studies, 0010414020912262.
Cui, J., Wang, H., & Ji, Y. (2017). Optical modulation format conversion from one QPSK to one BPSK with information-integrity-employing phase-sensitive amplifier. Applied optics, 56(18), 5307-5312.
De Filippi, P., & Hassan, S. (2018). Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: From code is law to law is code. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.02507.
Dormann, Markus, Stefan Hinz, and Eveline Wittmann. "Improving school administration through information technology? How digitalisation changes the bureaucratic features of public school administration." Educational Management Administration & Leadership 47.2 (2019): 275-290.
FabihanMeraj, Q., Azad, S., & Doorwar, V. E-Governance And Bureaucracy In Contemporary Indian Public Administration: A Technological Revolution.
Fitria, H., Mukhtar, M., & Akbar, M. (2017). The Effect of Organizational Structure And Leadership Style on Teacher Performance In Private Secondary School. IJHCM (International Journal of Human Capital Management), 1(02), 101-112.
Friborg, M. K., Hansen, J. V., Aldrich, P. T., Folker, A. P., Kjær, S., Nielsen, M. B. D., ... & Madsen, I. E. (2017). Workplace sexual harassment and depressive symptoms: a cross-sectional multilevel analysis comparing harassment from clients or customers to harassment from other employees amongst 7603 Danish employees from 1041 organizations. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1-12.
Ghosh, M., Srivastava Shubhangi, C. J., & Mishra, H. N. (2018). Advent of clean and green technology for preparation of low-cholesterol dairy cream powder: supercritical fluid extraction process. Food Quality and Safety, 2(4), 205-211.
Gohil, J., Patel, J., Chopra, J., Chhaya, K., Taravia, J., & Shah, M. (2021). Advent of Big Data technology in environment and water management sector. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-19.
Hamdani, M. (2019). Technology Acceptance in the Use of Social Networks by Teachers and Employees of Education Offices in Ahwaz. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 18(1), 105-117.
Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Dezi, L. (2018). The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological forecasting and social change, 136, 347-354.
Schulman, P. R. (2020). Organizational structure and safety culture: Conceptual and practical challenges. Safety science, 126, 104669.
Segal-Reich, M., Doron, I., & Mor, S. (2019). Ethical Issues in Advocacy by Nonprofit Organizations: The Case of Legal Consultation and Representation of Older Clients in Israel. J. Int'l Aging L. & Pol'y, 10, 1.
Turnley, J. G. (2020). 4 Bureaucracies, Networks and Warfare in a Fluid Operating Environment. Military Mission Formations and Hybrid Wars: New Sociological Perspectives.
Vakeel, K. A., & Panigrahi, P. K. (2018). Social media usage in E-government: Mediating role of government participation. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 26(1), 1-19.
Wang, H. Hong, Y. (2009), "China: technology development and management in the context of economic reform and opening", Journal of Technology Management in China,. 4, Iss: 1, 4-25.
Webb, S. P. (2017). Knowledge management: Linchpin of change. Routledge.
Zakharova, L., & MacKinnon, E. (2020). Trust in Bureaucracy and Technology: The Evolution of Secrecy Policies and Practice in the Soviet State Apparatus (1917–91). Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 21(3), 555-590.