In this article, after explanation of Descartes innovation about anthropology, in the first section the features of Descartes’ doubts, and precedence of will over thought; means to think willingly are considered and proved that the proof of “idea obviousness” and “I thi
More
In this article, after explanation of Descartes innovation about anthropology, in the first section the features of Descartes’ doubts, and precedence of will over thought; means to think willingly are considered and proved that the proof of “idea obviousness” and “I think” in philosophy of Descartes is based on will. “I” will to doubt, think and then I am. In this way, will is taken for granted and this is a point which ignored by Cartesian. In the second section after recognition of doubt, with pose of will discussion the separation of practical mind and theoretical mind, and wisdom from philosophy in Descartes. In the third section is going to be talked about the basis of thinker in relation to natural “I” and the center of conscience which the very first step is displayed in vastness and undoubtfulness issues. The last section talks about this that, can Descartes suffice to “moral provisory” of “code of morals” as highest and the most complete moral principles which needs perfect wisdom to other sciences and is the last level of wisdom? After recognizing this issue and answering the question, the position of code of morals is considered in Descartes philosophy.
Manuscript profile