Violating social rights and disrupting social order will make the community more responsive to a distracting person. This reaction has long been the practice of punishment in most criminal systems. As we know, pursuit of a specific purpose in the execution of punishment
More
Violating social rights and disrupting social order will make the community more responsive to a distracting person. This reaction has long been the practice of punishment in most criminal systems. As we know, pursuit of a specific purpose in the execution of punishments is that of educating and reforming offenders and their socialization, and it has been proved on the basis of experience that the justice system Criminalization alone can not achieve this goal. As a result, criminal policymakers have recognized the range of criminal policy tools (from discounts to elimination or repeated punitive actions and criminal non-criminal actions) to enforce this goal, as denials. If so far the theories and foundations of criminal law have been attempting to justify criminal, criminal and retaliatory interventions, we now need some other theories and foundations to justify non-custodial intervention because the current evolution of criminal law is towards the elimination of criminality, mild The punishment and distribution of punishment among legal systems is aimed at protecting the basic rights and freedoms of citizens on the one hand and on the other hand, the ultimate goal of punishment is to be trained. In this article, it has been tried to provide justification for the necessity of extending this process by referring to the grounds for punishment, including the philosophical, criminological, and economic foundations
Manuscript profile
