• Home
  • Hossein Naseri Moghaddam
  • OpenAccess
    • List of Articles Hossein Naseri Moghaddam

      • Open Access Article

        1 - The explanation of the position of Human dignity right violator behavior in criminalization
        Fatemeh Masroor Mohammad Taqi  Fakhlae Hossein Naseri Moghaddam
        The accepted criteria of criminalization are different in legal systems because in the process of criminalization, we are not faced with one principle and criteria, but several criteria and principles in turn play a role in the criminalization process. Therefore, in jus More
        The accepted criteria of criminalization are different in legal systems because in the process of criminalization, we are not faced with one principle and criteria, but several criteria and principles in turn play a role in the criminalization process. Therefore, in justifying the criminalization of a behavior, several criteria may be considered by the legislator, such as preserving human dignity, protecting moral values, denying harm, preserving fundamental interests, establishing social order and implementing criminal justice, etc. Dignity is not only a religious value but also as a universal human value that is deeply emphasized in religious teachings including the Qur'an and in the world arena in the first half of the twentieth century with the issuance of the Declaration. Recognized by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Human dignity is the basis for the formation of two attitudes of morality and perfectionism on the basis of criminalization of legal systems. Dignity is not only a religious value but also a universal human value. In the view of morality, the violation of social values and in the view of perfectionism, in addition, the violation of moral values and damage to human personality and human character can also be criminalized, which can be done through legal requirements and guarantees of performance in politics. Criminal protection. Human dignity is one of the pervasive values of this world, which in the process of criminalization and criminal proceedings, also prevents unnecessary interference with criminal law, and in fact, by providing criteria and criteria such as the prohibition of cruel and disproportionate punishments as well as the prohibition of double punishment, torture And the instrumental use of human beings has limited the criminal rule of governments. In a dignity-based criminal policy, the interaction of human instinct with the rules of criminal policy is evident in all stages from the stage of criminalization to the execution of punishment and restoration of dignity. In the present article, while explaining the concept of human dignity and explaining its limits, an attempt is made to study the perspective on criminalization of behaviors that violate dignity, its principles and documents. Manuscript profile
      • Open Access Article

        2 - Investigating the place of moral values in alimony and the feasibility of abolition of alimony in Iranian jurisprudence and law with a comparative study of American law
        Fakhr Afagh  Hamidi Seyed Ahmad Ali  Hashemi Hossein Naseri Moghaddam
        The wife's right to alimony in Islam and civil law, following Imami jurisprudence, is one of the inalienable rights of a permanent wife that a man is required to pay. Regarding the place of moral values in alimony, we came to the conclusion that the reason for the oblig More
        The wife's right to alimony in Islam and civil law, following Imami jurisprudence, is one of the inalienable rights of a permanent wife that a man is required to pay. Regarding the place of moral values in alimony, we came to the conclusion that the reason for the obligation of men to pay alimony in Islamic law, given the different characteristics of men and women and the ability of each, is this obligation for men and not women and a moral value is the basis. It was a verdict. Regarding the necessity of the right to alimony, while examining the famous and unfamiliar opinions of the jurists, the lack of specification of the legislator and the unanimous decision of the Supreme Court, we came to the conclusion that as soon as the marriage is concluded, the wife is entitled to alimony and Muscat will not . Regarding the possibility of abrogation of alimony by the wife before concluding the marriage and its obligation, abrogation of this right from a legal point of view will be a valid and ineffective case; However, it seems that abortion after marriage is partially acceptable by the wife and does not interfere with the validity of the marriage and the legislative interests. In American law, although the issue of revocation of rights is not the same as in our law, alimony is a reciprocal obligation of the couple that not only does not expire during the cohabitation, but can also continue for each couple after the divorce. Unless the spouses agree or do not demand from each other, in such a case, according to the rule of the principle of will and the absence of the legislator in the personal relations of the spouses (except in cases of disagreement) the agreements of the parties will be valid. A comparative study of the differences in the field of alimony found positive cases in the American legal system and suggestions were made to amend the laws. Manuscript profile