List of Articles تبعیض

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Equality and Non-Discrimination in Social Security in Islamic State
  Ramin  Movahedi Seyyed Hossein  Malekuti Hashtjin Abulfazl  Ranjbari
  Social Security is one of the most important mechanisms for the realization of social justice. Iran's legal system, especially after the victory of the Islamic Revolution and the spread of slogans of justice and equality, and the elimination of all forms of discriminati More

  Social Security is one of the most important mechanisms for the realization of social justice. Iran's legal system, especially after the victory of the Islamic Revolution and the spread of slogans of justice and equality, and the elimination of all forms of discrimination and inequality, at least is in the pursuit of policies and programs to spread social justice through the social security mechanism in many constitutions and laws. The Islamic state of early Islam (Prophet's and Amir al-Momenin (pbuh) governments) views was based on establishing the principle of equality and non-discrimination in the welfare of Muslims. The Islamic State of Iran, whose constitution is regulated by the application of Islamic laws and principles, has also sought to establish the rules governing social security on the basis of principles such as the principle of equality and non-discrimination, and the legislator requires the Islamic state to interfere in its implementation and supervision. Therefore, social security laws in Iran, although as set out in its original objectives, have not been able to comply with the principles of Islamic laws, due to lack of resources and increased population, the efforts made represent the will of the Islamic State along the path to justice and equality in this category. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - A Study of Behavioral Duality and Social Discrimination of the Soviet Government in the Asylum Seek of the Democratic Sect in 1325
  ghader kiyani
  20.1001.1.23833279.1401.13.49.8.7
  After the defeat of the Democratic Party of Azerbaijan by the military forces of the Central Government on December 12, 1958, a number of military-political leaders and some ordinary members and supporters were forced to take the path of the Soviet Republic of Azerbaija More

  After the defeat of the Democratic Party of Azerbaijan by the military forces of the Central Government on December 12, 1958, a number of military-political leaders and some ordinary members and supporters were forced to take the path of the Soviet Republic of Azerbaijan. They faced great problems in terms of housing, food, clothing, and health. Of course, considering the economic, social and other conditions after the Second World War, these bad conditions seem natural and acceptable in terms of the lack of basic biological facilities. But in these circumstances, what was seen from the behavior of the communist government of the Soviet Union in practice was the dual and discriminatory treatment of the refugees of the democratic sect. The military and political leaders of the Democratic Party, along with a few others, had the facilities and privileges, but at the same time, as mentioned above, a very large number of simple refugees in addition to the smallest living facilities including food, housing, health, clothing. Etc. were deprived. Distance from family and relatives became an additional problem and they demanded to return to Iran. But party and military leaders were free of this problem. It should be noted that he was the only sincere leader of Muhammad who wanted to return home. The article seeks to answer the question of whether the Soviet treatment of refugees was discriminatory. The hypothesis of the article is that the slogan of socialist equality of the Soviet government in dealing with the refugees of the democratic sect was forgotten. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - Equality in the opinions and opinions of the Guardian Council with emphasis on human dignity
  mehdi meftahi sayed mohammad sadegh Ahmadi ghodrat allah noroozi baghkmeh
  20.1001.1.23833279.1401.13.49.12.1
  Today, dignity-based legal equality has found an irreplaceable role in modern human rights. Therefore, on the one hand, in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, several principles, including the ninth paragraph of the third principle and the nineteenth and t More

  Today, dignity-based legal equality has found an irreplaceable role in modern human rights. Therefore, on the one hand, in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, several principles, including the ninth paragraph of the third principle and the nineteenth and twentieth principles, deal with the principle of equality, and on the other hand, the Guardian Council as an institution to protect the constitution. According to the Sharia and the constitution, you must consider these principles and cite them. In this research, with a descriptive-analytical approach, an attempt is made to examine the status of equality from the perspective of human dignity in the views of the Guardian Council to determine to what extent the Guardian Council in its opinions and views has invoked this basic principle and authorized rights. In the second chapter, the constitution is guaranteed; Because human dignity is the foundation of legal equality and human beings have the status of equality and therefore are equal in rights. A study of the views of the Guardian Council from the beginning of the revolution until now shows that this council has invoked the principle of equality and non-discrimination in its views on several occasions; But the point to consider is that the council's view of the principle of equality is sometimes merely formal, and in essence equality and positive discrimination have been overlooked in some cases. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  4 - Examining the legal foundations of eliminating discrimination and violence against women with a view to the commitments of the Afghan government
  mojgan moshfeghi peyman bolori salman valizadeh
  20.1001.1.23833279.1401.13.50.15.6
  Violence against women is a serious and global human rights problem. However, this problem is more common in underdeveloped countries such as Afghanistan, and it is widely used against women in the family, workplace, and society in various ways. However, in this country More

  Violence against women is a serious and global human rights problem. However, this problem is more common in underdeveloped countries such as Afghanistan, and it is widely used against women in the family, workplace, and society in various ways. However, in this country, in line with the legal protection of women, measures such as; Including articles protecting women against violence against them in the constitution, the approval of most human rights conventions, the preparation of national documents and strategies, etc. have been done. In this research, a descriptive-analytical method has been used to examine the legal foundations of eliminating discrimination and violence against women by looking at the commitments of the Afghan government. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  5 - apartheid; An example of violation of the rule of prohibition of discrimination. Focusing on moral values and looking at the Palestinian issue
  Fatemeh  Beigi Mirazizi Sattar  Azizi Farid  Azad Bakht Mohammad Javad  Jafari
  Discrimination is known as an international crime, the prohibition of which is a mandatory rule in international law and is a necessity in order to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms and guarantee his dignity and even in some cases to maintain international p More

  Discrimination is known as an international crime, the prohibition of which is a mandatory rule in international law and is a necessity in order to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms and guarantee his dignity and even in some cases to maintain international peace and security. Therefore, the principle of prohibition of discrimination has a prominent role in the international human rights system. The Geneva Quadrilateral Conventions of 1949 and the Additional Protocols of 1977 contain provisions that expressly prohibit "adverse discrimination" against persons affected by armed conflict and occupation, and require equal treatment between certain categories of persons, such as the sick, and this is the first step in considering Making apartheid a war crime. After this first step, the human suffering caused by the political ideology of apartheid in South Africa during 1948 to 1994, which drew global condemnation and a variety of diplomatic and legal responses, led to the adoption of the Apartheid Convention in 1973 as a crime against humanity. And also, war crime became the first in Article 85 (4) (c) of the Additional Protocol. These international reactions did not stop even after the end of the apartheid era, and in 1998, apartheid was included as an example of war crime in the Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Furthermore, paragraph 1 of Article 86 AP I, which obliges parties to suppress serious violations of the Protocol, ensures that apartheid is included as a war crime in the domestic criminal laws of many countries, and the destruction of apartheid in South Africa will not change this. In fact, it is the increasing (but debatable)use of the term apartheid in laws that makes Israel's actions in the Occupied Palestinian Territories(OPT)cause or even increase individual criminal prosecution in this context. In other words, although the inclusion of the Apartheid Convention on Israel's actions faces challenges, there are no such restrictions regarding the provisions of API. Manuscript profile